Thanks for the feed back! 4,585 pointsBadges: report Next View All Replies ADD YOUR REPLY There was an error processing your information. Magalhaes Stefaan Pouseele Blogs Books Hardware ISA Appliances SSL Acceleration Links Message Boards Newsletter Signup RSS Feed Software Access Control Anti Virus Authentication Backup & Recovery Bandwidth Control Caching Content Security We'll email youwhen relevant content isadded and updated. We're a friendly computing community, bustling with knowledgeable members to help solve your tech questions. http://gigyahosting1.com/error-721/error-721-remote-computer-did-not-respond.php
Don’t miss out on this exclusive content! Also, Redoing the OS may or may not be necessary. I searched for such a log for VPN, and could not find it, and the event logs both on the local machine and the remote server do not show any events Stay logged in Welcome to PC Review! look at this site
Remote computer did not re... - 1.Sep.2003 10:40:00 AM scriven_j Posts: 8 Joined: 30.Aug.2003 From: London Status: offline I have worked it out. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. First let me explain the problem. > > > > > > The Problem: > > > > > > It can take up 6 retries for any remote user to Here's how I think it works. > > 1.
Port 47 (tcp or udp) has nothing to do with VPN. It's only the PPTP service that doesn't seem to like this in our > > situation, forcing me to use the router's IP address instead of the other > 15 > You'll be able to ask any tech support questions, or chat with the community and help others. But it can > > also result from a reply from the server came from a different IP (ie > > different from the IP address the client used to send).
If you're having a computer problem, ask on our forum for advice. So for example, I might use NAT to redirect WWW which would resolve to 126.96.36.199 to an internal IP on port 80. The VPN server works when I connect directly to it (to ip 10.0.1.8) 0 LVL 10 Overall: Level 10 Message Author Comment by:rj22005-03-03 Comment Utility Permalink(# a13447766) Also, when I have a peek at this web-site Here's how I think it works. 1.
By the way, the router's IP is the only pingable public IP, not that that should make any difference at all. Now that you use a > fixed IP, it always works. > > Incidently, you do not need to forward port 47. I implemented port forwarding (See Netopia - Server List (Port Forwarding) - NQG_025 for addtional detail) as the previous poster suggested. I have not been able to put a finger on the problem and I am looking at doing a complete re-install of the OS right now.
Well, it was set up as an endpoint (for a separate LAN-to-LAN), so was theoretically intercepting all PPTP traffic. https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/21334514/VPN-question-error-721-Remote-computer-did-not-respond.html Too many reports because report button is too convenient How to respond to your boss's email about a coworker's accusation? Error 721 Vpn Windows Xp Ask a Question Question Title: (150 char. If so, I apologize. > > ~Frank > > "Bill Grant" <> wrote in message > news:%... > > Hi, > > > > First off, I am glad to hear
Remote computer did not respond. navigate here Join & Ask a Question Need Help in Real-Time? Like I said, it can take up to 6 retries to successfully connect > to > > our RAS servers (up to 30 retries if the remote user is behind a Can a Bridged network be the reason PPTP struggles when NATed > to > > an > > > assigned IP rather than when using the router's IP?
Whenever we try to connect it display the following message: Verifying username and password... Following Follow Windows XP SP3 One machine is having a problem establishing a VPN connection with a remote server. If you can connect internally, then your server is setup correctly. Check This Out First let me explain the problem. > > > > > > > > The Problem: > > > > > > > > It can take up 6 retries for
But the reply goes through the same channel as above, so the reply doesn't have this IP in the packet. So for > > example, I might use NAT to redirect WWW which would resolve to > 188.8.131.52 > > to an internal IP on port 80. Usually 721 just indicates that GRE is being blocked.
However, I am having trouble understanding your reply. I am thinking that something may have happened that tore up the networking components of Windows somewhat, and this is what is causing the problem. 2,015 pointsBadges: report Subhendu Sen Feb Sort by: OldestNewest Sorting replies... I have been able to make this work now by setting it up on another router.
Is "ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.1.8 x.y.z.58 extendable" enough to make GRE pass through, or is something else needed? 0 LVL 10 Overall: Level 10 Message Author Comment Remote computer did not respond. - 30.Aug.2003 6:19:00 PM scriven_j Posts: 8 Joined: 30.Aug.2003 From: London Status: offline Hi,I am trying to get a VPN running between a client Using some types of routers (without support to NAT-T), and in case it is an L2TP VPN, you might need to tweek Windows XP registry to make it able to connect this contact form Frank Guest Hello everyone, I have FINALLY resolved an ongoing issue with our VPN connections that we have been experiencing for over a year now.
The type of network they form with their clients is a Bridged network. Arab vs. I had similar troubles when I installed a program to manage voip comunication inside the company. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the
This error may vary time to time from remote PPP peer is not responding to the remote computer.... I don't really know why sometimes you managed to connect by method 2. This is a widely > held > > > belief (even router manufacturers use it in their documentation), but it > > is > > > false. I have even shut down the firewall on the local machine without gaining anything.
Copyright © 2014 TechGenix Ltd. A PPTP connection will definitely fail if GRE is > > > blocked at the router. This doesn't explain why I could still somehow log onto the server from work, or why I couldn't log onto the router endpoint at the remote site, but I don't care I am not sure if I am clear on this?
The only downside is that one end is a dynamic IP address, so the IPSEC doesn't work, so it's unencrypted now.